ISO 27001 vs SOC 2: A Quick Breakdown on the Differences Between The Two
By: Rob Morris on October 3, 2019
Compliance standards are often a source of confusion for people who aren’t tasked with building and implementing the controls that help an organization meet an auditor’s expectations. There are many different information security standards developed by different organizations, some of which only apply to specific industries or are more relevant to companies that do business in certain countries around the world. Understanding the difference between them is often less important than knowing which ones are necessary for ensuring customers and vendors that an organization is a trustworthy partner when it comes to managing data.
Two of the most common compliance standards are ISO/IEC 27001:2013 (often shortened to ISO 27001) and SOC 2 reports. While they cover much of the same ground, there are some notable differences between them.
ISO 27001 Certificates vs SOC 2 Attestation Reports
The primary difference to keep in mind with ISO 27001 and SOC 2 reports is that only one of them (ISO 27001) involves a certificate of compliance. Although both are broadly referred to as compliance standards and involve an external audit, the results of that audit are quite different. Upon completion of an ISO 27001 audit, the auditor issues a certificate of compliance that indicates an organization meets the requirements laid out by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and International Electrotechnical Commission for protecting information and managing risk. An SOC 2 attestation report, on the other hand, does not involve certification or a certificate of compliance. It is an assessment by an accredited auditor as to whether or not a service organization’s security controls meet the relevant Trust Services Criteria that fall within the scope of the audit.
Differences between ISO 27001 vs SOC 2
While both compliance standards specifically address security, they focus on different areas. Understanding what each standard focuses on can help organizations determine which one they need to consider when evaluating a potential vendor or preparing to be audited as a contractor.
What is ISO 27001?
Broadly speaking, ISO 27001 focuses on “top of the pyramid” information security concerns, assessing how an organization protects the integrity of the data it controls and processes. At its core, the standard evaluates risk to information assets, which can be defined as IT systems, processes, and intellectual property. Controls, in the form of policies, processes, and procedures, must be put in place to mitigate those risks and ensure that all reasonable efforts are being made to protect information assets. These measures are often considered the foundation of information security, so meeting ISO 27001 standards often helps an organization to implement additional controls to meet other compliances (such as HIPAA or PCI DSS).
To obtain a certificate, a service organization must demonstrate that its Information Security Management System (ISMS) is capable of identifying, analyzing, and addressing all risks associated with information assets. The ISMS lays out controls like encryption protocols and access procedures as part of a comprehensive business model that ensures the Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability (C, I, & A) of data.
What is SOC 2?
While ISO 27001 is a top-down view of security that establishes the core controls and principles of a service organization’s business model regarding data management, an SOC 2 report provides an assessment of the controls that help to support that business model. The report itself is informed by the AICPA’s Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements (SSAE), which provides guidelines for how organizations should assess, evaluate, and report on their risk and security controls. An SOC 2 report takes a customer-focused approach to information security, looking at the logical and physical controls a service organization has put in place to manage and record how people access data, how those users are authenticated, and how any inappropriate activity is reported and managed.
The scope of an SOC 2 report varies according to which Trust Services Criteria need to be evaluated. While all SOC 2 reports include Security within their scope (which is why it’s often called the “common criteria”), an audit could also examine controls related to Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, and Privacy as well.
Preparing for a compliance audit is often a daunting situation for an organization. The best strategy an IT leader can take is to regard compliance as a year-round priority rather than something to think about only when it’s time to renew a certificate. An audit should be a verification of ongoing practices and an opportunity to improve processes, not something that represents a disruption. By focusing on the controls, procedures, and policies that make up the core criteria for any ISO 27001 or SOC 2 audit, service organizations can ensure that they’re always prepared to meet these exacting standards for their customers and partners.
About Rob Morris
Rob Morris is the Director of Program Management and the ISMS Manager. Rob chairs the vXchnge Information Security Council and manages the compliance campaigns and is our customer liaison.
Subscribe to vXchnge Blog
Choose a Data Center Provider that Solves Problems and Adds Value.